A Study on Participative Management Practices on Employee Performance
Open Access

A Study on Participative Management Practices on Employee Performance

Dr. Shabab Ahmed Rizvi1, Noor Rahiba Irfan2, Patil Shradha Bharat2, Qureshi Moin Peer Mohd.2, Rhythm Kumar2

1Associate Professor, Pillai College of Arts, Commerce, and Science (Empowered Autonomous), New Panvel
2Student, Pillai College of Arts, Commerce, and Science (Empowered Autonomous), New Panvel

Keywords

Participative Management Employee Performance Private Sector Banks Banking Sector Employee Engagement

Abstract

Participative management has emerged as a significant managerial approach that emphasizes employee involvement in decision-making processes. In service-oriented industries such as banking, employee performance directly influences customer satisfaction and organizational success. This study examines the impact of participative management practices on employee performance in private sector banks operating in the Navi Mumbai region. Primary data was collected from 100 employees of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank through a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Statistical tools such as percentage analysis, graphical representation, and chi-square test were used for analysis. The findings reveal a strong positive relationship between participative management practices and employee performance. The chi–square test confirmed that employee participation significantly influences motivation, job satisfaction, and performance levels. The study concludes that participative management practices enhance organizational effectiveness and recommends that banks strengthen employee involvement mechanisms to improve performance and service quality.

Received: 22 March 2026, Revised: 28 March 2026, Accepted: 01 April 2026, Available online: 20 April 2026

Download PDF

Cite As

Rizvi, S. A., Irfan, N. R., Bharat, P. S., Mohd., Q. M. P., & Kumar, R. (2026). A Study on Participative Management Practices on Employee Performance. International Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, 04(02), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19662604

DOI

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scroll to Top